CALAMITY! Well, all right, minor inconvenience, as the flusher-handle to the upstairs toilet randomly decided to break a little while ago. So I had a minor panic attack while I took off the lid and look inside - the connecting piece that runs from the handle to the actual flushing mechanism has snapped right off. It's floating somewhere down at the bottom right now. Anyway, I sullied my pearl-ensconced poet's hands with the task of manually flushing the toilet, which involved figuring out the basic mechanics of the thing and fiddling around with it. That worked - eventually - and after the initial Science Fair glee wore off, I decided to solve the other all problem somehow. Now, I could call a plumber but that's expensive, so I'm just going to go to the hardware store tomorrow and try to find the appropriate piece, then fix the damned thing myself. What can go wrong? Well, presumably a lot, but I'm going to go for it right up until the toilet explodes!
Batman Begins. Well, I didn't hate it and enjoyed it at the time, certainly. So here's a back down of what I thought of it, good and bad (SPOILERS):
1. Good: Gary Oldman as James Gordon, back when he was just a cop, and not the head of police. Actually he stole the show for me, because managed to completely roll with the mental punch of some guy in a batsuit making contact to take down the big Mafia force in the city, and demonstrated moral strength and awareness in a city otherwise overrun with crime. Oldman got to play an understated but brave character and brought some charm and amusement to him. It makes me long to see him more such roles, and not always as the ridiculous villains of movies like The Fifth Element.
2. Bad: Katie Holmes as Rachel, the loveable perky Assistant District Attorney who's supposed to serve as Bruce Wayne's conscience. Acting? So bad! I found her amusing in Wonder Boys, but here? The character is clearly meant to be intelligent, but still manages to ride the skytrain in the middle of the night through the grim, evil city - by herself - when she's shown with a car earlier and enough sense to be aware of how dangerous the city is. She naturally falls into a trap and any spark of bravery she shows here is deflated by having to be saved by Batman. She bobbles. She doesn't look old enough to have made assistant D.A. She's given horrible dialogue.
3. Good: Cillian Murphy as Scarecrow! He did a really excellent job of being utterly creepy and morally lax as a health care professional. He pulled off being a classic Bat-villain by having a screw loose and a proclivity for dress-up. He's given a solid villainous gimmick - the old stand-by of a fear-toxin - and manages to elude the old standby of the "poisoining the water supply" routine by adding a twist.
4. Bad: Christian Bale as Batman. First off, no humour whatsoever. I think he may have managed a whole two facial expressions. And his Batman is just so-- utterly-- blah. I mean, you don't have to go all the way with the weird, silly shit, but make some effort to have your super-cool superhero character display some emotion other than borderline psychotic constipation. And the cowl looked dumb. Honestly, he's a guy who runs around in a rubber pervert suit with bat-nipples and bat-ears. Certainly, go with the grim, go with the darkness, but you need to put in some colour to stop us from going crazy with it. He's a weird maniac, have a little fun with that.
5. Good: Gotham City as diseased, bulging mass overwrought and weighed down by its own misery. Good use of psychogeography and the cinematography was used effectively; the sets were designed to maximize the dour misery, and they made some effort to explain why the city was so rotten.
6. Bad: Ra's Al Ghul as the main villain. First off, they establish that he's the Batman's primary mentor figure before he becomes Batman, which is just so uninteresting; a cool aspect of Bat-mythology for was always that he went all over the world and studied with the very best in so many fields to achieve what he wanted. Including Lady Shiva, one of the five deadliest people on the planet, who of course had to be cut because GASP - a woman who can fight so well? No, no, no. Ra's has interesting aspects which weren't made use of, like the fact that his name means "Head of the Demon" - which would have helped with the film's themes, and make him more symbolic in his role with the League of Shadows. Plus, he had a talented assassin daughter who, in the comics, had an affair with Batman - something they could have adapted into the movie to make for an interesting romantic subplot rather than the shitty one they came up with for him and Generic Good Girl.
Whew, went off there.
7. Good: Michael Caine's Alfred, period. Hilarious, and meaningful.
8. Bad: "Your father was killed..." et cetera. I seem to remember his mother being there, even if she was given a total of two lines in the entire film. She also died, she was part of his reason for becoming Batman, she must have had some kind of meaningful exchange with her son. She could have been more in charge of Wayne Enterprises kick, perhaps, working with the humanitarian causes more - something. She was, as the movie portrayed her, a trophy wife who produced a child and therefore had no further reason to exist. Did Bruce even remember he had a mother? She was always in the picture with his father, but geez!
9. Good: The bat connection and how it came to be - as well as the idea of Fear - worked well, and was employed without having to resort to cheezy "Criminals are a cowardly and superstitious lot" lines. Worked well with the overall themes of Fear in relation to the Scarecrow, strengthening that whole plotline. Pity he couldn't have been a more primary villain.
10. Bad: His weird thing about not killing people, except for all those people he killed. He refuses to execute a man, fine, good for him - I'm all about compassion - but he then blows up the building, presumably killing the man in question and a couple hundred Random Ninja? And then goes back to Gotham and kills a lot of police officers in ridiculous car chases?
The movie wasn't altogether horrible, it was decent and fun enough for the most part, but I felt like I was laughing too much at "serious" things. A lot of the time the humour was only in "precious bits" - references to the original set of movies, or the comics - and that doesn't work if you haven't seen that other material. Michael Caine did a good job of bringing humour to the film, but he was marginalized so much. Morgan Freeman was quite strong as Lucius Fox, and was in no way a parody of himself. I often found my biggest complaint as a comic book geek wasn't "that wasn't in the comics," but rather that they ignored a lot of potentially interesting plot bits like Talia Al Ghul in favour of watered down weak plot bits like Rachel, bits which couldn't be explored. They have access to a lot of comic book plots and stories from whole decades that they could adapt and reimagine - making them wholly new, certainly, but not crap. At times they improved upon the myths - exploring why Gotham was the way it was, and why wasn't anybody doing anything - but at the same time they ignored stuff that would have made for a more nuanced movie. I like that the costume wasn't so ridiculous as the post-Burton films, no seething nipples and no codpieces, but the design was a bit off.